Doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.10.014

Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2008 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Interaction of Caffeine WithRegadenoson-Induced Hyperemic Myocardial BloodFlow as Measured by Positron Emission TomographyA Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Trial To the Editor: Regadenoson is a selective A2A adenosine receptor was comparable with and without caffeine (2.75 Ϯ 0.16 vs. 2.97 Ϯ agonist under investigation as a pharmacologic vasodilator in 0.16, p ϭ NS) The data show with 1-sided 95% nuclear stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) It has a confidence that any CFR reduction associated with caffeine intake higher affinity for A2A receptors than adenosine and is a more potent coronary vasodilator. It selectively dilates coronary relative Heart rate (HR) Ϯ SD during resting MBF was higher after to peripheral vascular beds, potentially due to the high density of caffeine as compared with placebo (65 Ϯ 11 beats/min vs. 61 Ϯ 9 coronary A2A receptors, and activation of a small percentage of beats/min, p Ͻ 0.05). Similarly, systolic (118 Ϯ 11 mm Hg vs. 112 Ϯ these receptors evokes maximal dilation The use of caffeine, a 10 mm Hg, p Ͻ 0.001) and diastolic (73 Ϯ 6 mm Hg vs. 70 Ϯ 7 nonselective competitive A2A receptor antagonist, has been con- mm Hg, p Ͻ 0.001) blood pressure were higher after caffeine traindicated before vasodilator MPI because it attenuates the versus placebo. The HR increase induced by regadenoson was coronary hyperemia caused by the nonselective adenosine receptor blunted by 20 beats/min (p Ͻ 0.001) after caffeine, whereas blood agonists adenosine and dipyridamole in a dose-dependent manner pressure was not significantly affected by prior caffeine ingestion.
The objective of this study was to determine the effects of No serious adverse event was reported. The most frequent caffeine on regadenoson-induced hyperemic myocardial blood flow adverse events were dyspnea (56%), palpitations (49%), flushing (30%), headache (28%), sensation of heaviness (28%), and pares- In this phase II, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled thesia (19%). Caffeine pretreatment did not change the incidence crossover study, 41 healthy volunteers (15 female) who were age 18 of adverse events but was associated with improved tolerability (as years or older, nonsmokers, and regular coffee drinkers received in assessed by a questionnaire) and attenuation of adverse event a blinded fashion either a 200-mg caffeine capsule—a dose corresponding to 2 cups of coffee on Day 1 and placebo on Previous studies found a dose-dependent attenuation of Day 2 or the inverse after refraining from methylxanthine- adenosine-induced and dipyridamole-induced CFR by caffeine containing products for at least 24 h.
The present study is the first to report the effect of caffeine on The MBF was measured 2 h after capsule ingestion by positron coronary hyperemia induced by a selective adenosine agonist in emission tomography (PET) with 15O-labeled water at rest and humans. It suggests that regadenoson-induced CFR was not immediately after intravenous administration of regadenoson significantly affected by prior caffeine ingestion (200 mg) and (400 ␮g over 10 s). Quantitative values of global MBF in remained above 2.0 for the majority of subjects. Therefore, it seems milliliters per minute per gram were obtained as reported Coronary flow reserve (CFR) was calculated as the ratio of that caffeine blunts the vasodilatory effect of adenosine but has a limited effect on regadenoson. This may be explained by the fact Continuous variables summarized as mean and SD or SE were that regadenoson has a higher A2A receptor affinity and compared using analysis of variance. A value of p Ͻ 0.05 was higher receptor reserve compared with adenosine, and is administered as a bolus (as opposed to a 6-min infusion for Twenty-one volunteers in the placebo/caffeine sequence and 20 adenosine). Therefore, regadenoson may lead to a higher A2A in the caffeine/placebo sequence completed the study. All subjects receptor occupancy and vasodilator effect compared with adenosine.
(mean age Ϯ SD 27 Ϯ 6 years) returned for the second study day Regadenoson increases MBF by acting on coronary A2A recep- after a washout period (2 to 14 days). Baseline caffeine levels Ϯ SE tors, and it increases HR by acting on both chemosensory neurons were comparable on the 2 study days (0.36 Ϯ 0.09 mg/l vs. 0.23 Ϯ and peripheral vascular A2A receptors. There is a higher receptor 0.09 mg/l) and increased significantly after caffeine, but not after reserve for coronary A2A agonist-mediated coronary vasodilation, placebo (4.26 Ϯ 0.18 mg/l vs. 0.33 Ϯ 0.18 mg/l).
and 25% occupancy by regadenoson translates into 90% maximal All resting and hyperemic MBF as well as CFR values were vasodilation. The receptor reserve for regadenoson on peripheral comparable irrespective of the sequence (caffeine/placebo or pla- A2A receptors and chemosensory neurons, however, is unknown cebo/caffeine) or period (Day 1 or 2). Thus, all data were pooled and may be lower. If the effects of caffeine are inversely propor- for comparison. The MBF Ϯ SE was not significantly different tional to the receptor reserve, then the higher receptor reserve between caffeine and placebo at rest (1.13 Ϯ 0.04 ml/min/g vs.
required to dilate coronary vessels than to increase HR may explain 1.06 Ϯ 0.05 ml/min/g) and stress (2.98 Ϯ 0.14 ml/min/g vs. 3.05 Ϯ that caffeine significantly blunted the increase in HR but had a 0.14 ml/min/g). Consequently, the regadenoson-induced CFR limited effect on MBF caused by regadenoson.
MBF Increased Significantly After Regadenoson (A) Myocardial blood flow (MBF) at rest and after regadenoson; (B) regadenoson-induced coronary flow reserve (CFR). Caffeine had no influence on resting or hyperemic MBF. Coronary flow reserve was not affected by caffeine.
Overall, regadenoson was well tolerated; side effects were generally mild or moderate in severity and all self-limiting. Caffeine attenuated 1. Hendel RC, Bateman TM, Cerqueira MD, et al. Initial clinical the severity of side effects and improved tolerability of regadenoson.
experience with regadenoson, a novel selective A2A agonist for phar- The interaction of caffeine with adenosine-induced, dipyridamole- macologic stress single-photon emission computed tomography myo- induced, and even exercise-induced MBF changes may limit the cardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:2069 –75.
correct detection of coronary artery disease and subsequently the proper 2. Shryock JC, Snowdy S, Baraldi PG, et al. A2A-adenosine receptor management of the patient, leading to the general recommendation to reserve for coronary vasodilation. Circulation 1998;98:711– 8.
3. Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, et al. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines withhold caffeine for 24 h before vasodilator stress testing Because the for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging— executive sum- hyperemic MBF response to regadenoson after caffeine administration mary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart lies well within the range of reported response to nonselective adenosine Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC receptor agonists and bicycle stress the present study suggests that Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of regadenoson causes coronary hyperemia with and without prior caffeine Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging). J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:1318 –33.
ingestion in healthy volunteers and moderate caffeine consumption may 4. Lapeyre AC 3rd, Goraya TY, Johnston DL, Gibbons RJ. The impact of caffeine on vasodilator stress perfusion studies. J Nucl Cardiol 2004;11: not interfere with regadenoson stress MPI. Further study in patients with coronary artery disease and possibly at higher caffeine doses would be 5. Bangalore S, Parkar S, Messerli FH. “One” cup of coffee and nuclear required before definitive conclusions could be drawn SPECT to go. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:528 –9.
6. Namdar M, Koepfli P, Grathwohl R, et al. Caffeine decreases exercise- induced myocardial flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:405–10.
Oliver Gaemperli, MD
7. Eggbrecht H, Gossl M. Regadenoson (CV Therapeutics/Astellas).
Tiziano Schepis, MD
Curr Opin Investig Drugs 2006;7:264 –71.
Pascal Koepfli, MD
8. Zoghbi GJ, Htay T, Aqel R, Blackmon L, Heo J, Iskandrian AE. Effect of caffeine on ischemia detection by adenosine single-photon emission Patrick T. Siegrist, MD
computed tomography perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol Samuel Fleischman, MD
Patricia Nguyen, MD
Ann Olmsted, PhD
Whedy Wang, PhD
Hsiao Lieu, MD
*Philipp A. Kaufmann, MD

*Cardiovascular CenterNuclear CardiologyUniversity Hospital NUK C 32 Zurich Center for Integrative Human PhysiologyRamistrasse 100 In a clinical trial aiming to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of drug-eluting stents in comparison with bare-metal stents (BMS) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the description of the end points should be clear and identical. As an importantcomposite clinical end point, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was given 3 possible full names without any definition Please note: this study was supported by CV Therapeutics (Palo Alto, California) and by Menichelli et al. in the SESAMI (Sirolimus-Eluting Astellas Pharma US (Deerfield, Illinois) and by a grant from the Swiss NationalScience Foundation (SNSF Professorship Grant No. PP00A-68835 and PP00A- Stent Versus Bare-Metal Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial, which could cause confusion. In the Methods section,

Source: https://com-radiology.sites.medinfo.ufl.edu/files/2012/07/Interaction-of-Caffeine-with-Regadenoson2.pdf

peoplesgroup.in

Informative Article Lactic Acidosis In Critically Ill Patients Shafali Nandwani, *Mahip Saluja, **Mayank Vats ,**Yatin Mehta Department of Medicine, * Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Subharti Medical College, Meerut-250002, **Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi-110044 Abstract: Lactic acidosis is defined as increase in blood lactate level

An-682 terminating f100k ecl inputs

Terminating F100K ECL Inputs Introduction cuit. The designer should be aware that although Figure2A, Figure 2B, and Figure 2C supply ECL compatible sig- ing F100K ECL Many F100K designs require that certain inputs be pre-nals levels, they differ in power consumption and suscepti-sented with a HIGH or LOW level. Because of the con-bility to changes in temperature and VEE. structio

Copyright © 2009-2018 Drugs Today