J. Trop. Agric. and Fd. Sc. 30(1)(2002): 31–37Characterization of Vibrio vulnificus isolated from retail cockle and shrimp by plasmid profiling and antibiotic susceptibility test (Pencirian Vibrio vulnificus yang dipencilkan daripada kerang dan udang dengan profil plasmid dan ujian kerentanan antibiotik)
S. Radu*, T.A.F.T. Ahmad* and A.M. Sahilah**
Key words: Vibrio vulnificus, shrimp, cockle, antibiotic resistance, plasmid
Abstrak Daripada 148 sampel kerang (Anadara granosa) dan 433 sampel udang (Paneus indicus) yang dikaji, 27% dan 6.9% masing-masing didapati positif mengandungi Vibrio vulnificus. Sebanyak 29 pencilan daripada kerang dan 21 pencilan daripada udang dikaji untuk kerintangan terhadap antibiotik. Semua pencilan menunjukkan kerintangan kepada satu atau lebih antibiotik yang diuji. Dalam ujian transkonjugasi, tiada kaitan didapati antara plasmid dengan berat molikul yang tinggi (35.8 Mda) yang dikesan di dalam beberapa pencilan, dengan fenotip kerintangan. Ini menunjukkan kerintangan antibiotik adalah berasaskan kromosom. Profil plasmid dan corak kerintangan antibiotik digunakan sebagai pendekatan awal untuk mencirikan, pada tahap pencilan, kesemua pencilan daripada kerang dan udang yang dikaji. Analisis corak kerintangan antibiotik menunjukkan polimorfisma fenotipik yang tinggi. Walau bagaimanapun oleh sebab banyak pencilan yang tidak ada plasmid, teknik ini kurang berguna dalam pencirian. Keputusan ini menunjukkan bahawa pencilan V. vulnificus yang mempunyai kerintangan pelbagai dan mempamerkan variasi genotip dan fenotip, amat mudah diperoleh daripada kerang dan udang. Keadaan ini berpotensi membahayakan kesihatan awam. Abstract Of the 148 cockle (Anadara granosa) and 433 shrimp (Paneus indicus) samples examined, 27% and 6.9% were positive for Vibrio vulnificus, respectively. Twenty-nine and 21 isolates from cockles and shrimps were examined for their antibiotic resistance. All isolates showed resistance to one or more of the antibiotics tested. In transconjugation tests, no relationship was found between the high molecular weight plasmid (35.8 MDa) detected in several isolates and their resistance phenotypes, indicating that their antibiotic resistance is chromosomal. Plasmid profiles and antibiotic resistance patterns were used as a preliminary approach to type, at strain level, the isolates from cockles and shrimps. Analysis by antibiotic resistance patterns showed a high phenotypic polymorphism. However, the high number of isolates devoid of plasmid rendered this technique less useful. These results indicate that multiresistant V. vulnificus
*Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Food Science and Biotechnology, Universiti Putra Malaysia,43400 Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia**Strategic Resources Research Centre, MARDI Headquarters, Serdang, P.O. Box 12301, 50774 Kuala Lumpur,MalaysiaAuthors' full names: Son Radu, Tg Ahbrizal Farizal Tg Ahmad and Sahilah Abdul MutalibE-mail: [email protected] Agricultural Research and Development Institute 2002
Vibrio vulnificus in cockles and shrimps
isolates exhibiting genotypic or phenotypic variations are easily recovered fromcockles and shrimps in the study area, posing a potential public health risk. Introduction Materials and methods Vibrio vulnificus is a naturally occurring,
Sample collection, isolation and
free-living inhabitant of brackish water and
identification
salt water. It prefers tropical to subtropical
climates and proliferates in areas or during
months where the water temperature exceeds
distilled water and the cockle shells were
1993; Hoi et al. 1998). Though the number
of people infected with V. vulnificus is low
illnesses, this bacterium has the ability to
intravulvar fluid were collected in individual
sterile stomacher bags. The samples (50 g)
(Morris and Black 1985; Hlady 1997).
were enriched in 450 mL of alkaline peptone
or undercooked seafood, especially shellfish,
(Stomacher Lab-Blender 400). After 18 h of
serially diluted with alkaline peptone water
Klontz 1996). Most cases of V. vulnificus
and 0.1 mL of 10–3, 10– 4, 10–5 and 10– 6
infections are sporadic and characterized by
dilutions were plated onto thiosulfate citrate
bile salts agar (TCBS) plates (Oxoid Ltd,
include gastroenteritis, wound infection and
incubated for 18–24 h at 37 °C. Five non-
fermenting sucrose colonies (green coloured
virulence factors of V. vulnificus has yet to
colonies) per samples were transferred onto
duplicate plates of TCBS agar to obtain pure
molecular diversity of V. vulnificus strains
should offer insight into their ecology and
standard biochemical tests as described by
epidemiology of V. vulnificus as a result ofavailability of various molecular techniques
Antibiotic susceptibility tests
Disc diffusion tests were performed three
Ryang et al. 1999), relatively little effort has
Malaysia. Thus, in the study reported here,
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory
patterns and plasmid profiling were used to
Standards (1997). All strains were tested
characterize the V. vulnificus isolated from
against 15 antibiotics: bacitracin (10 µg),
cockles (Anadara granosa) and shrimps
carbenicillin (100 µg), cefoperazone (75 µg),
ceftazidime (30 µg), ceftriaxone (30 µg),cephalothin (30 µg), chloramphenicol(30 µg), erythromycin (15 µg), gentamicin(10 µg), nalidixic acid (30 µg), norfloxacin
been found to harbour 1–7 plasmids with
sizes ranging from 1.5 to 35.8 megadalton(MDa) (Table 1). Plasmid analysis grouped
Plasmid DNA isolation
Plasmid DNA of the V. vulnificus strains was
groups, with three isolates showing the same
extracted three times from each isolate by
the mini-preparation method of Sambrook et
unique plasmid profiles. In genetic transfer
electrophoresed in 0.7% agarose gel. The gel
photographed under UV transillumination.
phenotypes or plasmid. Antibiotic resistance
Plasmids of Escherichia coli V517 were
patterns allowed division of the 50 isolates
used to determine molecular weight of each
plasmid (Macrina et al. 1978). Conjugation tests Discussion
Multiresistant V. vulnificus isolates
Although occurrence of foodborne V.vulnificus infection has not been recognized
in Malaysia, it has been widely recognized
studies. The selected resistant isolates, as
donors, were incubated overnight at 37 °C
consumption of various V. vulnificus-
with a nalidixic acid-resistant E. coli K12 as
contaminated seafoods (Hlady 1997; Morena
the recipient on nutrient agar plate. The
positive for V. vulnificus is not surprising as
Transconjugants were selected by plating the
diluted mating mixtures (10–1 to 10– 4) on
molluscs such as oysters, clams, mussels and
nutrient agar plates containing 50 µg/mL of
nalidixic acid and inhibiting concentration of
agent to which the donor isolates had been
numbers of positive shrimp positive (30/433)were small, shrimp as a primary source of
V. vulnificus contamination cannot be ruled
out. Therefore, more research is needed to
positive for V. vulnificus, yielding 80
contamination with V. vulnificus.
only 30 were positive for V. vulnificus,
Vibrio vulnificus includes two biotypes
differences in biochemical property (Tison
V. vulnificus were randomly selected from
et al. 1982). In this study, V. vulnificus
sources. Only biotype 1 has been associated
showed the presence of both V. vulnificus
biotype 1 and 2 from both sources (Table 1).
previously identified as only pathogenic for
Isolates were resistant to one or more of the
15 antibiotics tested; exhibiting a wide range
opportunistic infections in humans (Amaro
of multiresistance distribution and resistance
to as many as 12 antibiotics (Table 1). Vibrio vulnificus in cockles and shrimps
source of the contamination, additional tests
V. vulnificus biotype 3, a newly identified
virulent clone of V. vulnificus causing
because of the possibility for sample-to-
outbreak of wound infection and bacteremia
sample transmission. However, the sources
associated with exposure to pond-cultured
of V. vulnificus and the routes of
contamination of the product examined are
system for V. vulnificus in Malaysia. The
Vibrio vulnificus has been reported to
ingrained tradition of consuming foods and
chloramphenicol, aminoglycoside, and third-
increase the risk of infection, especially
generation cephalosporins (Tacket et al.
1984; Morris and Black 1985). These results
situation is of special interest risk, since
ran contrary to our finding of V. vulnificus
there are certain practices that encourage
(Table 1). Such resistance might be due to
the indiscriminate use of these antibiotics.
survival of Vibrio spp. during heat-treatment
Despite the fact that the usage patterns of
of cockles and in street foods indicate their
antibiotics in animals or humans in the study
potential as sources of infection (Rusul et al.
area is still not clear, it cannot be disputed
1997; Liew et al. 1998). Regardless of the
Table 1. Vibrio vulnificus isolates examined in this study
aNumber in parenthesis indicate biotypes of the isolates. VC and VS denoteisolates from cockle and shrimp, respectivelybTested for bacitracin (B), carbenicillin (Cb), cefoperazone (Cfp),ceftazidime (Caz), ceftriaxone (Cro), cephalothin (Cf), chloramphenicol (Cm),erythromycin (Er), gentamicin (Gm), kanamycin (Km), nalidixic acid (Na),norfloxacin (Nor), penicillin (P), streptomycin (Sm) and tetracycline (Te)
multiresistant V. vulnificus strains in cockles
phenotypes in bacteria and usually the high
prompts the need to evaluate their potential
antimicrobial therapy would be required.
independent experiments the five isolates
Multiresistance to antibiotics is therefore a
transconjugation, an observation indicating
epidemiological interest, but of overriding
that resistance phenotypes of these isolates
concern is the efficacy of these antibiotics in
the treatment of multiresistant V. vulnificus
infections. Every source of resistance must
more than one genotype or phenotype could
safeguard the efficiency of antibiotics in the
resistance patterns. It is also worth noting
examined shared some related genotypes or
phenotypes. Jackson et al. (1997) reported
weight plasmid of 35.8 MDa were tested for
on the V. vulnificus infections caused by
their abilities in transconjugation. In general,
Vibrio vulnificus in cockles and shrimps
populations in shellfish. Therefore, multiple
Acknowledgement
isolates from a single sample type should be
This study was supported by the Malaysian
typed in epidemiological and contamination
Government through the Intensification of
Research in Priority Areas (IRPA) grant. The
authors gratefully acknowledge Dora Bulan
V. vulnificus strains tested, the present results
in the preparation of the manuscript.
indicate that there were only a limitednumber of isolates recovered from cockles
References
and shrimps sharing the same genotypes or
Amaro, C., Biosca, E.G., Esteve, C., Fonz, B. and
phenotypes (Table 1) and they were
Toranzo, A.E. (1992). Comparative study of
phenotypic and virulence properties of V. vulnificus biotypes 1 and 2 obtained from a
European eel farm experiencing mortalities.
could not be excluded. Looking through the
Dis. Aqua. Organ.13: 29–35
antibiotic resistance patterns and plasmid
Arias, C.R., Verdonck, L., Swings, J., Aznar, R. and
profiles, it was observed that there were
Garay, E. (1997). A polyphasic approach to
study the intraspecific diversity amongst
Vibrio vulnificus isolates. Syst. Appl. Microbiol.20: 622–33
Austin, B. and Austin, D.A. (1999). Bacterial fish
similar plasmid profiles, but had different
pathogens: disease of farmed and wild fish.
antibiotic resistance patterns. These results
suggested that antibiotic resistance pattern is
Bisharat, N., Agmon, V., Finkelstein, R., Raz, R.,
not influenced by the presence of plasmids,
Colodner, R., Cameron, D.N., Wykstra, D.L.,Swerdlow, D.L., Farmer III, J.J. and for the
Israeli Vibrio Study Group. (1999). Clinical,
resistant phenotypes of the isolates tested
epidemiological and microbiological features
of Vibrio vulnificus biogroup 3 causing
carefully the typing technique used as they
bacteraemia in Israel. The Lancet 354:
could provide a different insight into the
Hlady, W.G. (1997). Vibrio infections associated
with raw oyster consumption in Florida, 1981–1994. J. Food Prot. 60: 353–7 Conclusion
epidemiology of vibrio infections in Florida,
characterization of V. vulnificus strain using
1981–1993. J. Infect. Dis. 173:1176– 83
phenotypic (antibiotic resistance patterns)
Hoi, L., Larsen, J.L., Dalsgaard, I. and Dalsgaard,
A. (1998). Occurrence of Vibrio vulnificus
biotypes in Danish marine environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64: 7–13
methods to differentiate V. vulnificus of the
Jackson, J.K., Murphree, R.L. and Tamplin, M.L.
same or different biotypes. The strains from
(1997). Evidence that mortality from Vibriovulnificus infection results from single strains
which allowed for a simple determination of
among heterogeneous population in shellfish. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35: 2098 –101
inter- and intra-biotype genetic differences.
Kasper, C.W. and Tamplin, M.L. (1993). Effects of
The possibility of using antibiotic resistance
temperature and salinity on the survival of
patterns, and to a less extent the plasmid
Vibrio vulnificus in seawater and shellfish.
profiles as an adjunct, for differentiation of
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59:2425 –9 V. vulnificus strains can provide knowledge
Liew, W.S., Leisner, J.J., Rusul, G., Son, R. and
of their diversity in epidemiological studies.
Rasip, A. (1998). Survival of Vibrio spp. including inoculated V. cholerae O139 during heat-treatment of cockles(Anadara granosa). Internat. J. Food Microbiol. 42: 167–73
Macrina, F.L., Kopecko, D.J., Jones, K.R., Ayers,
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E.F. and Maniatis, M. (1989).
D.J. and McCowen, S.M. (1978). A multiple-
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd
plasmid-containing Escherichia coli strain:
convenient source of size reference plasmid
molecules. Plasmid 1: 417–20
Strom, M.S. and Paranjpye, R.N. (2000).
Morena, M.L. and Landgraf, M. (1998). Virulence
Epidemiology and pathogenesis of Vibrio
factors and pathogenicity of Vibrio vulnificusvulnificus. Microb. Infect. 2: 177– 88
strains isolated from seafood. J. Appl.
Tacket, C.O., Breener, F. and Black, P.A. (1984). Microbiol. 84: 747–51
Clinical features and an epidemiological study
Morris, Jr. J.G. and Black, R.E. (1985). Cholera and
of Vibrio vulnificus. J. Infect. Dis. 149:
other vibrioses in the United States. NewEngl. J. Med. 312: 343–50
Tison, D.L., Nishibuchi, M., Greenwood, J.D. and
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory
Seidler, R.J. (1982). Vibrio vulnificus
Standards. (1997). Approved standards
biogroup 2: a new biogroup pathogenic for
M2–A6. Performance standards for
eels. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 44: 640 – 6 antimicrobial disc susceptibility tests. 6th ed.
Veenstra, P.J., Rietra, J.P.G.M., Stoutenbeck, C.P.,
Coster, J.M., De Hier, H.H.W. and Dirks-Go,
Oliver, D. (1989). Vibrio vulnificus. In: Foodborne
S. (1992). Infection by an indole-negative
bacterial pathogens. p. 569– 99. (Doyle, M.P.,
variants of Vibrio vulnificus transmitted by
eels. J. Infect. Dis. 16: 209 –10
Rusul, G., Chun, C.K. and Son, R. (1997). Survival
Vickery, M.C.L., Smith, A.L., DePaola, A., Jones,
and growth of Vibrio cholerae O139 in
D.D., Steffan, R.J. and Bej, A.K. (1998).
selected Malaysian street foods. J. Food Prot.60: 644 – 8
Ryang, D.W., Koo, S.B., Shin, M.G., Shin, J.H. and
intra-species differentiation of Vibrio
Suh, S.P. (1999). Molecular typing of Vibriovulnificus. J. Microbiol. Meth. 33: 181– 9 vulnificus isolated from clinical specimens by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. Japanese J. Infect. Dis. 52: 38 – 41 Accepted for publication on 20 February 2002
This article was downloaded by: [Ingenta Content Distribution - Routledge]On: 11 March 2009Access details: Access Details: [subscription number 791963552]Publisher RoutledgeInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House,37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UKThe American Journal of BioethicsPublication details, including instructions f
Funct i o ns The information contained in this booklet is for educational purposes only. Pleaseconsult a professional health care physician. Interferon Production, T-Lymphocytes and Echinacea Common Na m e s : Black Sampson, Purple Coneflowe r, Ru d b e c k i a , Ac t i ve Compounds: echinacoside, polysaccharides (echinacin),antibiotic polyacetylenes, betaine, caffeic acid glyc o s i d e